Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vinamra Shastri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vinamra Shastri[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO. He is a jobbing middle management employee. The sources do not show that he is a philanthropist. The sources do not show he passes GNG they are as follows. Passing Mentions: 1, 2, 6, 7. Written by the subject: 3 and 4. Finally 5 is a quote from him about a report his company drew up. No in-depth coverage whatsoever and nothing turned up in a before search. The creator has just also created an article on the company he works for so probably a WP:UPE account or at best WP:COI Dom from Paris (talk) 13:37, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:37, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:37, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment He can not inherit notability. So family having political background certainly doesn't count. However, he is debating and writing about politics in credible places so that might be considered for being an influencer in politics if not being a politician. Also noticed he is part of Entrepreneurs' Organization which needs the company's leader to have US$1,000,000 business. Plus some quotes in various articles on management. That maybe can be considered for being someone in the corporate space. Exploreandwrite (talk) 09:50, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you are claiming that he meets WP:NJOURNALIST then sources have to be added to show he meets the criteria. Just writing in credible places doesn't make you a notable journalist especially as the only 2 articles that are cited are identical opinion pieces but in 2 different langauges. --Dom from Paris (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:40, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:23, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:08, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Merely writing articles (even several op-eds or pieces) in high quality RS don't make you notable.∯WBG^converse 20:15, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Spiderone 09:26, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.