Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Village Christian Schools
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Per consensus to keep based on WP:NHS. (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 07:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Village Christian Schools (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable private school. Article reads like somebody copy/pasted the prospectus. Biker Biker (talk) 23:05, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete WP:G12 They did. I've tagged it with a copyright vio speedy deletion tag.I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 23:24, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. All high schools are notable. I stubbed the article to remove the copyvio. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Roadrunner Keep. Same reason here as Eastmain said. Also, "Unremarkable private school" sounds like a opinion reason, not a fact. LikeLakers2 (talk) 00:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep With recent changes, I've struck my above support for a speedy delete. High schools are generally held to be notable per WP:NHS. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 00:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, high schools have been judged to be inherently notable. Copyvio should still be revdeleted (I think that's how it works? that's how it was on another article I helped fix) but it's no longer in the article, so that CSD no longer applies. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:22, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, the way forward with high school articles is to fix and expand not delete. Sources are available to meet WP:GNG. TerriersFan (talk) 03:27, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.