Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villa Amalia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. W.marsh 01:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Villa Amalia

No evidence of notability. Only 37 google hits including wikimirrors and one or two that do not refer to the same structure. Was prodded a while back, but the tag was removed. Indrian 14:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No notability stated. This might apply to a few of the other squat articles at Category:Squats. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 15:38, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; Not notable. Inner Earth 16:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; Notability? it was the first squat in Greece, EVER. Project2501a 00:27, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, looks legit on the surface, but some reliable sources would help a lot. --badlydrawnjeff talk 00:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am also inclined to keep the article. Of course, it does not have a lot of Ghits, but since this is a Greek subject, I think we could give this a shot. I state this since this states some of the squating issues in Greece. In Culture, at least this group was forming from this sqaut. I also think these Greek postings could shed some light. Let some of our Greek editors, who also speak Greek, take a peek at Greek-language websites and see what can be done to expand this topic, or at least, redirect this to the plain Sqauting article or Athens article. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 00:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it was the first squat in greece Thanasis 07:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep it is a very known 16 years old squat and still powerfull in the antiauthority movement --paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.97.30.14 (talk • contribs) 11:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article as it stands does not assert its notability - it states "one of the first anarchist squats". If it had any sources at all (from reliable sources) I'd change my vote. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 13:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I am with Stu ^{’Bout ye!} on this one. Right now, there is no indication that this is in any way important from a reliable source. Absent that, this article should go. If someone on this page who voted keep actually put some effort into documenting the importance of this place, then I would agree the article should be kept. Indrian 14:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. On the grounds of lack of notability. If it is so important, at least some references should be expected. Porfyrios 17:28, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. lack of notability? the first anarchist squat in Greece? :) Project2501a 09:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is not even a current affairs entry. Let us be just a little serious ladies and gentlemen, we really have to draw the line somewhere... Politis 16:29, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.