Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viktor Pogadayev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 20:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Viktor Pogadayev

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created and largely maintained by article subject. Notability not apparent. Appears to be self promotional Merbabu (talk) 09:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PS - and contravenes WP:AUTOBIO. --Merbabu (talk) 22:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Although it cites books, it isn't enough for a encyclopedia article, not to mention it's been contributed by subject. SwisterTwister (talk) 05:42, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 14:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nominator - inadequate third party reliable sources to establish adequate proof of wider notability Satu Suro 01:29, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:AUTOBIO and WP:N. Orderinchaos 10:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.