Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikas Bharati Public School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mere existence is no longer accepted as justification for keeping articles about high schools, and the consensus of other comments is that there are not sources to support notability under the usual standards. RL0919 (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vikas Bharati Public School

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 16:26, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per time-honoured precedent. Most high schools have historically been kept except when zero independent sources can be found to prove that the institution actually exists, as evidenced by thousands of AfD closures. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:17, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Either it meets WP:NORG or it doesn't. We can't start making exceptions for high schools, but not colleges, or public colleges but not private colleges. Alternate proposal might be to add WP:Notability and WP:Primary tags to the article and re-submit to AfD in 6-12 months. If it's a keep, it's the softest of all possible keeps. Doug Mehus (talk) 02:58, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't think there are any WP:42 available (at least I can't find any). The only mentions in secondary sources I am seeing are about crimes that faculty and staff were accused of. Rockphed (talk) 12:26, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per the Feb 2017 RfC, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist. There are no reliable independent sources. SD0001 (talk) 14:44, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SD0001, Can you wikilink-ify the Feb 2017 RfC, if possible, as this would be helpful for the future? Thanks. Doug Mehus (talk) 14:47, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SCHOOLRFC. SD0001 (talk) 14:51, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.