Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidhya Vinod (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vidhya Vinod[edit]

Vidhya Vinod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A previous article about this person was created by a now-blocked WP:COI account and deleted in August 2020. The present article was created as a Draft by a new user, declined 3 times at AfC between January and June 2021, but has now been moved to mainspace by the article creator. (The Infobox photo can also be seen in this reference but has been uploaded to Commons as being from another account's "personal collection".) I can't see the previous article instance to compare it, but Timtrent's rationale on that AfD seems applicable to the present instance, as do the rationales in the AfC rejections, such as that appearing in a 100-richest-women-in-a-country list is not inherently notable here. Although receiving one of 5 New Indian Express "Verve" awards in 2019 is noted in the article, that does not appear inherently notable for WP:ANYBIO #1, and would have been open to consideration in the 2020 AfD. Clearly this is a person who has board roles in various companies but I am not seeing evidence that encyclopaedic notability is demonstrated. AllyD (talk) 09:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Opposing the Deletion The above-stated reasons are just baseless, she had made some remarkable achievements as a woman and that's the reason why the media covered the achievement widely. she is a widely notable person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.156.209.34 (talk) 11:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Remember declining it and having a discussion on it. Wasn't notable then, ain't notable now. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and SALT pretty clearly a PR piece and does not appear to be any more notable than she was when the previous version was deleted. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:11, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.