Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video Violence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Video Violence[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spotted during post-deletion cleanup. This film does not seem to have any claim to notability. No reviews found here either. Geschichte (talk) 07:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:24, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I was able to find some coverage from places like Bleeding Skull and DVD Talk, but I will say that the sourcing was a bit difficult to find since it required weeding through various false hits and unusable sources, given that the term "video violence" is now pretty generic. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on ReaderofthePack's improvements.★Trekker (talk) 15:56, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY Donaldd23 (talk) 19:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as reliable sources reviews have been found and added to the article to source a reception section so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.