Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video Games as Stress Release

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Video Games as Stress Release[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD: topic isn't notable; article is essay-like and has only one source. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:05, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete yes, it's basically an OR opinion. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 09:51, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete - unsourced material put aside, this is complete WP:OR. 11coolguy12 (talk) 13:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Should be one sentence in Casual video game. Kitfoxxe (talk) 16:26, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I originally PRODed it, then it was removed, then rePRODed, then removed, then AfD'd. My reasoning was WP:NOT#ESSAY. Bar Code Symmetry (Talk) 03:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or to save face for a newbie, merge into Stress management. Bearian (talk) 20:09, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - as Video Games as Stress Release is sometimes used in occupational therapy and stress management, I can see potential for a decent article. I know little of either field but I suggest no prejudice to article recreation (with WP:RS, etc) if deletion goes ahead. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 13:39, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 13:44, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.