Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vidar Bahus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 08:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vidar Bahus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD: "this guy has over 100 games in the top tier of Norway so this isn't an uncontroversial deletion, AfD if you still feel there's not enough there" Fails WP:NFOOTY and lacks sustained, non-routine coverage to pass WP:GNG. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A top league? The guy was a bus driver and part-time footballer. I see some trivial mentions (mostly goals conceded) in the national press and a handful of WP:ROUTINE articles in his local paper, of the sort any non-League footballer in the UK might get. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seems to be some significant coverage, needs more discussion on those sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 18:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.