Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victory FM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Victory FM

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Unreferenced article about non-notable radio station. Cannot find significant coverage from independent sources. Even if kept, needs total rewrite. Other article, Kevin Huffer, by same author also at AFD. Wknight94 ^talk 16:07, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nuke and start over A fully licensed radio station is generally considered notable, but this article needs to be burnt to the ground and rebuilt from scratch. Subject yay, this article a big fat nay. DarkAudit (talk) 18:07, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:11, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non notable. Article is a diary and best left scribbled on the authors note paper. Szzuk (talk) 19:19, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Sorry learned W'pedia people - I seem to have been miss out of the loop on the decission do remove my topic from it's own page. I know not what your understanding or refference is so I can't challenge it. I guessing that it is probably zero (sorry to be blunt) I'm sure that you would have constructed it better, that I can relate to but I'm just someone in posesson of the information, the formating withing the rules here are something I will need assistance with.

Is it possible for the article to have a get out of jail card please.

If you care to state you understanding, participation, relavant background to this I'm happy to talk further and I'd bedelighted to recieve what ever halp you can offer interms of format presentation.

Making the comments that you have, so bluntly, I guess if the norm here, so may I offer one comment as a blunt ending. To start the ball rolling, please state your knowledge base or reistate the article. ... and stop having little power moments behind closed doors it's rther like the article was guilty with out a fair trial.

Aside from that please keep up the good work you are no doubt doing for little thanks.

Wiki is just brilliant. Thus I wanted to do my little but too on a topic I think I'm probably defacto on. I know - I ain't no schoolar! Fair cop.

Mark

(Avictorian (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]