Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Tognola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Tognola[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

completely lacking of citations about the inner claims and affirmations, the page appears to be a subject-promoting page nor neutral or filtered. Nothing is supported by a reference except his profession and other parts seems to have a too much (and un-supported) big emphasis Gin Anmon (talk) 09:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I added the SwissFilms entry on the subject as a reference but am not finding more substantial coverage of him and his career. The current text is so grotesquely excessive in unsubstantiated superlatives as to need WP:TNT, but if the awards could be verified, and they were further confirmed to be notable in themselves, then there could be a case for a stub article saying just that he is a director of documentaries and commercials and has won X awards. However as things stand, I don't see evidence that he meets the WP:CREATIVE criteria. AllyD (talk) 10:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.