Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Subirana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 23:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Subirana[edit]

A shadowy historical figure -- so much that even the vague and contradictory article acknowledges that almost nothing is known about him, and the very few texts that cite him play like a conquistador equivalent of "Rashomon." In any event, it fails WP:BIO. Ecoleetage (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Failing WP:BIO is a good way to lack notability. Leonard^(Bloom) 21:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I wonder if this is a hoax. The references seem to exist, but even though they are on Google Books, I get no hits on Google Books or Google Scholar for "victor subirana", "subirana de veliz", "siboney forucan", etc. --Groggy Dice T | C 22:06, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.