Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicious dog man

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:35, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vicious dog man[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person known for only 1 (non-notable) event. Prodded per WP:BLP1E, contested by creator of article. Jarkeld (talk) 07:32, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sorry, Vicious dog man, the general notability guidelines require more than the usual fifteen minutes of fame. I'd say it fails under WP:NOT#NEWS, but this isn't even news. Mandsford (talk) 13:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pensioner gets a run on the tabloid news for barking like a dog. Can't get a clearer case of WP:BLP1E than that. --Mkativerata (talk) 23:08, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E. St Anselm (talk) 23:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fifteen seconds of attention have expired. WWGB (talk) 01:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly not notable per per WP:BLP1E Nick-D (talk) 05:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable per WP:BLP1E. Bleakcomb (talk) 05:53, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.