Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vichanath Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vichanath Singh[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reason:

Cricketers who fails WP:NCRIC. Whilst they have made their debut today for an Associate team, they fail point #4 of WP:NCRIC as the match is not a World T20 (men or women), Global Qualifier (men or women) or Regional Final (men only) fixture. Note that the user has previously been told about the notability requirements. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with all of these for the reason stated by Lugnuts. Not a notable enough T20I and none of these players meet any of the other criteria either. Bs1jac (talk) 07:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:45, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 08:45, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:31, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:32, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:33, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Do not meet the revised inclusion guidelines for associate T20I matches as specified in WP:CRIN. StickyWicket (talk) 11:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination ~SS49~ {talk} 14:19, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Remembering that CSD G4 does not apply when a player reaches notability, therefore, if and when these cricketers need to be reinstated, there is no issue. Bobo . 16:31, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Moaz786 (talk to me or see what I've been doing) 18:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.Icewhiz (talk) --MA Javadi (talk) 19:01, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Human (talk) 12:18, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NCRIC or WP:CRIN. I cannot find significant coverage of him in reliable sources. Not a notable enough for a single T20I Match. this article should be deleted.-Nahal (talk) 12:19, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple articles actually. Human (talk) 05:22, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom as they do fail rule 4 of the WP:NCRIC HawkAussie (talk) 05:05, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I realise I am late to this, but in April 2018 the ICC decided to grant full T20I status to all its members. Therefore, all these players have played cricket at the highest level. St Anselm (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@StAnselm: There was a discussion last year to tighten the notability requirements following the ICC's change, so these players are not auto-notable. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:42, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Now you can see why I was so confused, Lugnuts! I still don't fully understand whether all the players in the third column on the Cricketarchive teams list are notable by CRIN... Bobo . 20:40, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Until they appear in the regional final of a qualifier they won't be. Germany v Belgium friendly matches, played by amateurs, on a matting wicket, where the standard is poor just can't be considered noteworthy - they're essentially the same as they were before the status was assigned. CRIN works fine as it is. Sadly we can't AfD T20I status for all-teams because it's a statistical shambles. StickyWicket (talk) 15:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.