Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicetone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (proclaim) @ 20:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vicetone[edit]

Vicetone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article doesn't meet WP:BANDS criteria, also there are no independent sources for the information Kges1901 (talk) 09:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 15:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 15:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 15:27, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E 16:40, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per The1stEditor: I have greatly expanded the content and sources for the article ever since it was nominated for deletion. I have added a large amount of cited information to the biography in particular and also have expanded their discography. In total, I have added six new links to cite the material from independent sources. This is on par with what is normal among articles that have been on Wikipedia by similar artists for a while. You can independently verify this though viewing the article from when it was submitted for deletion and after my edits. The1stEditor 11:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Angiev1997: I have added several relevant sources since this page's creation and references have now been placed on the page and show Vicetone's credentials to be granted a Wikipedia page. The page now has a similar number of references to other dance music artists of Wikipedia. Angiev1997 00:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.