Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vic Edelbrock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Paul August ☎ 05:13, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Vic Edelbrock[edit]
The founder of Edelbrock bike parts. While the company looks deserving enough of an article to have an extra entry for the founder is vanity. Pilatus 11:06, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- First off, the above information is wrong. Vic Edelbrock began his business by building automotive parts, the first of which was a manifold for a '32 Ford Roadster. Secondly, The main reason I created this entry is that there was a request for it on the Smokey Yunick page in the form of red hyptertext. I find it fascinating that there exists a Wikipedia article for Marey Carey, the porn actress who ran for governer of California, but one on a man who is partially credited for being the father of the automtive performance industry is considered vanity. MiracleMat 15:18, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep. Notable. mikka (t) 18:45, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. One of the most significant people in the creation and development of the automotive aftermarket performance parts industry. A major name among hot-rodders, sanctioned drag racing, and sanctioned oval-track racing. Barno 20:43, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Unless this article is expanded to indicate notability, it would be better redirected to Edelbrock. Dottore So 20:49, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. No content. Split out again if biographical content on the individual emerges. — Phil Welch 23:00, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- definite keep A pioneer in the field of speed equipment. Some would say he invented the business. He was the first ever to use nitromethane fuel -Carl Redmond
- Keep. Article has been improved since it was listed on AFD and the subject is notable. Quale 21:57, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. The company is not exactly world-renowned, and that certainly doesn't make the president notable enough. And avoid sub-stubs when there's no content in the parent article. / Peter Isotalo 00:51, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- While I agree that a moderately sized company's president isn't notable just for that reason, I believe that my earlier comments are valid and sufficient grounds for keeping and expanding. Since the creator hasn't gotten to it yet, I'll expand it a bit now. Barno 04:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- EXPANDED to explain significance somewhat, applying "sofixit" to myself. Still needs fleshing out, but less stubby and much less no-assertion-of-notability than before. The company's article still needs fleshing out. For a good historical source, search Stock Car Racing Magazine back articles from the 1980s for this name. I remember at least one article that was part company description and part bio of Vic Sr. and Vic Jr. If that magazine's archives aren't online, a good knowledgable source would be Dr. Dick Berggren, who was editor-in-chief for SCR then and publishes Speedway Illustrated now. Barno 04:49, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- While I agree that a moderately sized company's president isn't notable just for that reason, I believe that my earlier comments are valid and sufficient grounds for keeping and expanding. Since the creator hasn't gotten to it yet, I'll expand it a bit now. Barno 04:31, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.