Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verzache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No one has offered a rebuttal to RHirsch1770's final comment. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Verzache

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article is an up & coming musician who doesn’t satisfy any criterion from WP:MUSICBIO & lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 09:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:19, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable --Devokewater (talk) 10:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:50, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I created the page because it looks as if Verzache does fulfil criterion from WP:MUSICBIO. The Citations include Elevator Magazine, EDM.com, and Ones To Watch, as well as his inclusion in the "Concerts to Check Out in N.Y.C. This Weekend" article in the New York Times. These fulfil criterion 1 and 4 respectively. I believe this does meet the criteron for notability. Please let me know if it really doesn't so I can avoid this mistake in the future! RHirsch1770 (talk) 22:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope! No single criterion from WP:MUSICBIO is met, a simple 'before' search from any editor would confirm that. Feel free to bring to this AFD the sources you feel makes subject of our article satisfy #1 & #4 of WP:MUSICBIO. Also which article from The NY times do you speak of? Celestina007 (talk) 23:57, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused. I cite Verzache being recommended in [New York Times], and reviewed on [[1]] and [To Watch]. All of these are cited in the article, Verzache. This meets #1 because Verzache "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." This is #1 ofWP:MUSICBIO. Although Elevator Magazine is additionally cited, this includes segments from an interview and so cannot help fulfill #1. I also argue that Verzache fulfills criteria #4 because by being covered in the New York Times for his international concert tour ([New York Times]) he "has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country." Thank you for your time. RHirsch1770 (talk) 20:53, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:40, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.