Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronika Dvořáková

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Closing as keep since sources are present, but require addition onto the article and further expansion. No consensus for delete. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Veronika Dvořáková[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite being a member of Czech Republic women's handball team as well as the winner of 2018 Czech Women's Handball First Division, this person has not received enough sources to meet WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Google searches come up with silly, random namesakes. CuteDolphin712 (talk) 16:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Handball, and Czech Republic. CuteDolphin712 (talk) 16:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:39, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep denik has some articles about her. Especially this article and also idnes with this interview. If you google <<"Veronika Dvořáková" Hazena>> there are more sources. 🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 18:47, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to try translate the articles and re-word myself if this nomination was kept. However, since I knew nothing of handball-related subjects the moment, it's admitted difficult. CuteDolphin712 (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the concern is absence of sources, and this is dealt with in the comments here by Malo95, so I see no enduring rationale for deletion. Article needs improvement, not deletion. C 679 07:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.