Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronica Lalande-Lapointe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 00:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Veronica Lalande-Lapointe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography article lacks in-depth sources to establish notability. The only citation fails verification so essentially the article is un-referenced. After searching, found a few websites with a passing mention, but unable to verify facts in the article. Created on 10 November 2006.}} JoeNMLC (talk) 00:51, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete
While I did find other sources (and even a page giving zodiac information to hide her exact birthday), I didn't find anything covering her in any depth. She bowled for the Canadian youth league in 2003 and 2004; qualifying scores in the 2006 Cup; that she had also bowled in the 2005 Cup, also alongside Michael Schmidt; that her rank in 2005 was 31, so she moved up 10 places, good on her; and that there are more listings on reddit for Wikipedia AfD than I'd ever cared to wonder about.
On the plus side, I did find a single actual news article: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/schmidt-finishes-third-at-bowling-world-cup/article20416705/
But I didn't find anything to show notability. Per the sports criterion, I think the coverage I found falls under "trivial".
I do see where it was once nominated for deletion once before, back on 2013-08-13. OIM20 (talk) 08:04, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.