Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vern Moen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:10, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vern Moen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 17:08, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 22:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 22:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. sst✈^(discuss) 08:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I think the subject is notable, but... the article would be much better if it were rewritten; it appears to have been written by Mr. Moen himself. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 04:41, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:40, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:21, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not seeing evidence of notability. At the moment the sources cited are: the website of a company owned by the subject, Myspace, some videos on an advertising site, a blog, material written by the subject, a short profile at the site of a film festival the subject attended (probably written by him or someone associated with him) and a trivial mention in a post about a short video directed by the subject. All non-independent, unreliable or not significant coverage, so WP:GNG isn't passed, and I couldn't find anything significantly better when I looked. Hut 8.5 15:57, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per the above, also I can not find exception under clauses similar to those in WP:TOOSOON. Aeonx (talk) 16:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.