Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vermont Working Families Party

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Working Families Party. North America1000 03:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vermont Working Families Party[edit]

Vermont Working Families Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article only links to self-published sources. It does not appear to have any elected officers or any non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. Any useful information can be folded into the article for the national Working Families Party. Toa Nidhiki05 19:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Working Families Party as even the article sources/external links are about that party. There has been some local coverage (e.g. [1]) but basically this party is the answer to a trivia question about Vermont politics (see [2]). We can't merge unsourced information to the larger article, so that leaves a redirect from a plausible search term to the larger article where this party is already mentioned. Bakazaka (talk) 16:16, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:34, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.