Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vermillion county democratic party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vermillion county democratic party

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability beyond being a localized branch party of a larger political party. Most party groupings stop at the state level unless they have particular news that makes national news. Only one news article from a local newspaper and it mentions both the Democrats and the Republicans from the county asking for young people to vote, nothing terribly notable. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:30, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not an independently notable organization; fails WP:GNG. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 01:38, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not an general notability guideline. Even it is independently in the future, the article is WP:TOOSOON for now. SA 13 Bro (talk) 04:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per notability guidelines. Natureium (talk) 16:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We do not typically keep articles about individual counties' local chapters of national political parties, except maybe very occasionally in the event that they can be reliably sourced as the subject of an unusual volume of press coverage (i.e. nationalized) that marks them out as significantly more notable than most of their 3,000+ equivalents in other counties. But this isn't: apart from one article in the local newspaper that's about the general phenomenon of encouraging youth to vote, this is referenced entirely to primary sources that can verify additional facts after notability has already been properly supported by enough media coverage to clear WP:ORGDEPTH, but cannot bring the notability in and of themselves. Bearcat (talk) 17:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete if this was a subject that merited coverage, we would have an article that gave a full historical sweep. There are thousands of counties in the US, are we really prepared to have articles on the Republican, Democratic and Whig parties in each of them. OK, Whig in only some. Some other parties would merit articles if this one does. This is not a good plan.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.