Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veridicanism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:52, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Veridicanism[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This religion appears to be non-notable. I wasn't able to find any reliable sources online. The little green pig (talk) 07:33, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just trying to introduce the subject. Perhaps it's not ready yet for wikipedia. In fact, I'm pretty sure it's not. The website for it has just started, there is no mention of it outside of online forums. I think it may be better to revisit this in a few years.

I understand if it must be deleted. Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackspiritpubs (talk • contribs) 07:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your understanding. There are many places to introduce or promote this (such as Facebook), but Wikipedia is not one of them. --MelanieN (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG, and even the page author has admitted that it is not currently notable enough for inclusion. — sparklism ^hey! 13:37, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I nearly PRODed this yesterday at NPP but I got sidetracked with something else and when I came back today it was already at AFD. Recommend deletion based on the fact that it seems to be a neologism with low notability and no widespread use. Basically fringe. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:10, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:28, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete After reading about "the online Church of the Veridican which started in January of 2013," I'm tempted to invoke WP:MADEUP. This "religion" appears to consist of a single person, one Edward J. Gordon, and a few self-published books. --MelanieN (talk) 18:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of significant independent coverage - does not meet the requirements for notabiilty ---- _nonsense ferret 18:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- the whole thing looks like a minor splinter group of Christianity, very probably with a single church. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not even a church - just a website. --MelanieN (talk) 01:35, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete more like a splinter than a splinter group, since there doesn't appear to be a real group. Even then, it would need to have significant coverage in Reliable Sources. First Light (talk) 19:41, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.