Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venus Redemption

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to NDreams. (non-admin closure) feminist 06:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Venus Redemption (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Video game project started a decade ago, received minor coverage at the time, barely enough to warrant an article even back then. It has had essentially no additional coverage in nearly a decade, causing additional notability concerns per the WP:SUSTAINED section of WP:GNG. The project also seems to have been dropped years ago, and the company's main article (nDreams) makes no mention of it. Indications are this project will never be completed nor will it receive more coverage in WP:RSes. —Torchiest talkedits 19:30, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge – I had originally created the article, thinking something was actually going to become of it, and eventually completely forgot about it as no information came about. The last bit of information was several years ago. I'd say move what can be moved to the nDreams article. --JDC808 19:46, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:46, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.