Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venus (wrestler)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 03:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Venus (wrestler)

Contested prod. Article was previously prod in December for being about a non notable wrestler and little has changed (both with the article and wrestler in question). The most notable thing she has done is work Ohio Valley Wrestling, WWE’s developmental territory (though article does not state if she was under a WWE contract or not), with only two appearances being mentioned, one of them a dark match. Also, the only two sources for the article are her official web page and her official My Space. Nenog 04:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails WP:N, working for OVW is not on it's own enough to give someone "notability" MPJ-DK 11:32, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Warrush
Delete per nom. If they ever get called up to the main roster then recreate. Darrenhusted 15:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of notability. JJL 15:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, agreed. Non notable until called up to the main roster (which may or may not even happen). Nikki311 16:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete notability not established (MySpace & personal sites are not suitable reference sources per WP:V#SELF) EyeSerene^TALK 08:49, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.