Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venus (Low song) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Venus (Low song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The last time it was nominated, it was done by a block evader. The song fails WP:NSONGS (No charts, no awards, no covers by another artist(s)) OR WP:GNG. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 00:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nothing to indicate why this subject is notable. Bearing in mind that notability is not inherited from a parent article. Red Phoenix ^{build the future...}_{remember the past...} 04:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 22:36, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am not even convinced that the band itself is truly notable, never mind this song (on which I was able to find no discussion by independent, reliable, third party sources to speak of). KDS4444^Talk 22:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.