Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venugopal Madathil
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No clear consensus after two redirects. Nominator changed his position from "delete" to "keep" but does not appear to be a reliable commenter either way. MelanieN (talk) 00:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
- Venugopal Madathil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is one article about him in Indian Express, but fails WP:GNG. And the page creator could be related to the subject. Greek Legend (talk) 04:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC) blocked sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 18:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 18:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 18:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as a prolific contributor to the film industry in the field of cinematography , the Indian Express article about him is significant coverage from a reliable source, at least one more RS needed.Atlantic306 (talk) 19:30, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as there are still no obvious signs of better improvements, delete considering WP:ENTERTAINER. SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.