Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vent Pro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:30, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vent Pro[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined WP:AfC draft that was then moved into main space by the author. In line with WP:NSOFT, I have checked for coverage in Gbooks, Gnews and Gscholar and found nothing under both publishers listed in the article. This would not pass WP:GNG by the looks of it either. It is currently referenced only to forum posts that were made on 7th January (yesterday as I type this). I'm no software genius but this doesn't strike me as being a notable enough piece of software for Wikipedia. Spiderone 17:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:38, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete After removing all references that led to 404 Not Found, this article currently has ZERO sources. - Insurance Lovers 16 January 2021

The complete lack of sources makes me think that this is a hoax. I mean I can't even find a company website or a Facebook page or anything... Spiderone 22:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know much about the process, but given all of this, could this be changed to a Speedy Deletion? I can't see how anyone would possibly support keeping this. Insurance Lovers 13:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by InsuranceLovers (talk • contribs) [reply]

In hindsight, I should have requested speedy delete as hoax or used WP:PROD. I thought that the article creator might contest deletion so created the AfD but it doesn't look like this software even exists so probably shouldn't have bothered. It's probably best just to let the AfD run its course now that it's been going for 9 days or so. Spiderone 14:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.