Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vengalath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vengalath

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too small in area to be notable. Request AfD delete. ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒ _―Œ^{♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣} 18:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - couldn't find anything on Google. Chutznik (talk) 19:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a housing area is not a location, it is in a location. ¨¨ victor falk 20:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- –SpacemanSpiff 00:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete A "housing location" where 8 people live, including one "PhD aspirant"? Seriously. Let's break out the snow shovel already. Bfigura ^(talk) 01:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a housing area ??!!! :-). shouldn't this be a speedy delete candidate?--Sodabottle (talk) 03:48, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. LOL, its beginning to feel a lot like Christmas... JBsupreme (talk) 06:36, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Local neighborhood consisting of six houses? Salih (talk) 03:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.