Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vendor-neutral data centre
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 14:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Vendor-neutral data centre[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vendor-neutral data centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Whereas they do exist and the term is used I doubt the term is used enough to justify this article when we have the far better Data center article. As the info here is completely unsourced it might not be right to merge it to the data center article. Your thoughts? Chidgk1 (talk) 07:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Computing. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.