Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vejas Kruszewski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vejas Kruszewski

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Promotional article. Edwardx (talk) 13:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 14:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What about the articles cited in the entry? FloridaArmy (talk) 14:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Develop or Delete Is there something here? Maybe. Vejas has certainly been recognised within the fashion industry both through the nomination and then being a recipient of the LVMH award. And there is some citations that back this. But, What is this award? Why is it significant? Where is the article? This article might be a good start, but it lacks any depth of coverage. Nottoohackneyed (talk) 02:38, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:GNG. Article cites Vogue and Dazed; Globe and Mail also covered his award[1]; and other sources in fashion publications and general Canadian media e.g.[2][3][4] --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough indepth coverage to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 03:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails the criteria for notability, fails GNG and WP:PEOPLE. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.