Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veiloor GHS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:52, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Veiloor GHS[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable ROTM school, contains only mundane operational info with no indication of importance (if only schools were speediable...). Sources cited are directory listings and wikis, and a search finds only more of the same and some social media listings. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORG. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because the article is a glorified advert and the good, usable sources are so lacking that there's zero way to improve the article so it's not one. Let alone is there anything available to make it not fail the notability guidelines. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater (talk) 11:50, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 12:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Borderline WP:G11 but that's moot at this point. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 15:44, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — per rationale from both DoubleGrazing and Adamant1. Celestina007 (talk) 03:20, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.