Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vegetta777

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 02:28, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vegetta777[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is not in english, and subject is not clearly notable. dmartin969 02:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. dmartin969 02:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I am gong to bet that if he has 29 million subscribers, someone has written about him and he therefore meets GNG. For example, here, here, here, here and here are a start.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:40, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a few days ago a Spanish editor blanked an earlier version in proper English, which I have restored.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:54, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.