Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vegas Rummy
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Pastordavid (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Vegas Rummy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable, as per WP:MADEUP and WP:NOT#OTHOUGHT. A card game of which no record exists in the real world. Grandfather Clock (talk) 05:23, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Google does have a few sources for "Las Vegas Rummy" as oppose to "normal" Rummy. Perhaps it can be reduced to a stub by removing the OR (by someone more expert at the game than me). PeterSymonds | talk 09:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This article may now be deleted. I have posted the information elsewhere since wikipedia seems to show no interest in the gathering of knowledge. Patsissons (talk) 02:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp (talk) 23:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Its completely lacking references/citations inline or otherwise, however this just makes it a bad article, so I would propose that either it gets some references to improve the article.--KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 23:50, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not a notable variation of rummy, possibly made up by the author or played in a select group of friends. --Dhartung | Talk 05:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ziggy Sawdust (talk • contribs) 15:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.