Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ved Prakash (politician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:36, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ved Prakash (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable person. Fails GNG. this article was earlier PRODed but author removed the PROD himself. ChunnuBhai (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:44, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:10, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:10, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Working on a political party's IT team is not a notability claim that gets a person into Wikipedia in the absence of enough reliable source coverage about him to clear WP:GNG for it — but the sources shown here don't build that case, as not a single one of them even namechecks Prakash's existence at all, let alone being about him. Also, I can't prove it outright but this is pinging my conflict of interest radar as an article that was most likely created by either Prakash himself or a coworker of his. Bearcat (talk) 23:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.