Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vechoor church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 12:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vechoor church[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a non-notable church. No external references found. Westroopnerd (talk) 02:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note I moved the article to St. Mary's Syro-Malabar Catholic Church, Vechoor. Kraxler (talk) 21:23, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 03:09, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep or merge to Vechoor. Malayalam Wikipedia has quite a detailed article, with some references (though I can't guarantee how good they are). Google searches provide a few results in English - these do, however, seem to confirm it as a long-established local pilgrimage centre. If available sourcing does not seem to be good enough for a standalone article, a sentence or two should certainly be included in the article about it locality. PWilkinson (talk) 14:40, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Very old Church for this part of the world. Shows up well in image and books searches.160.39.35.48 (talk) 15:17, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I added some context, and there are many sources all over the web. Kraxler (talk) 21:23, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have added four book sources. Subject meets WP:GNG. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 12:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.