Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vazda Studios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Intermark Group. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vazda Studios

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orphan article created by Alexandra.routhier (talk · contribs), an editor who only edited Wikipedia from June 30 to August 15, 2008 to create the above article as well as MSP Intermark. The article reads like an advert and a resume, listing "clients and experience", the company president's prior experience, the specific services the company offers as well as what tools are used to provide these services. Extensive searches to locate reliable sources that mention the company in a non-trivial manner turn up empty, leaving me unable to verify that the company meets WP:CORP. I'll gladly withdraw my nomination if sources can be found showing notability and providing info that can be used to populate the article with encyclopedic information rather than its current advertisment-type information. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 19:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 01:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Intermark Group, the parent corporation. Interestingly, an analysis of the googlehits linked above will reveal that most of this article's content actually refers to the parent corporation.--Pink Bull 22:16, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 05:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Intermark Group per WP:FAILN. Click23 (talk) 20:39, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Intermark Group per Pink Bull. Per the Google News Archive search, the notability of Vazda Studios seems hinged on Intermark Group. Cunard (talk) 23:07, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Intermark Group per everyone else's statement. I also agree that WP:FAILN applies here. Buggie111 (talk) 19:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.