Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasile Adam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NOQUORUM. WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) Mr. Guye (talk) 22:27, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Vasile Adam

Vasile Adam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While I admire what this fellow does, it seems to me he doesn't remotely approach the notability criteria spelled out at WP:ARTIST. The sources just aren't there to back up a claim of encyclopedic merit: a puff piece in a no-name paper, and another puff piece penned by "Andrian Adam, intern at Timpul" - not coincidentally, the author of the article now up for deletion is one Andrian Adam. And the subject of said article is Vasile Adam. - Biruitorul ^Talk 01:12, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 01:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:19, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.