Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varsity Towers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 06:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Varsity Towers[edit]
- Varsity Towers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable residential apartment block like millions of others around the world. Harro5 06:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NN building. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 06:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, is not even a university property. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 08:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an article about a non-notable building. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 12:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable and almost entirely self sourced. The links also appear to be dead. Think outside the box 13:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I usually err on the side of keeping individual buildings, but nothing about this one appears to be notable at all. --Lockley (talk) 16:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, an unremarkable structure, whichever way you look at it. Possibly good value for nearby students, but that doesn't equate to notability. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.