Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varon Bonicos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Varon Bonicos[edit]

Varon Bonicos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails GNG. the notability flag has been there since 2013 and no sources have been added. The sources that are on the page are about "A Man's Story," a film he directed. The film already has its own Wikipedia page. A google news search for his name reports 20 results -- all 20 are about "A Man's Story" and mentioned him as the directory. No sources are about him. CerealKillerYum (talk) 03:14, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the subject directed a documentary called A Man's Story, which looks notable to me as there are plenty of reviews and interviews that could be used as sources. While the subject is mentioned and sometimes interviewed in those sources they all seem to discuss him in the context of the film and there's very little outside of that. A Man's Story doesn't have an article, and if it did I would suggest redirecting to it, but there's very little in this article which would be useful in constructing that one. Hut 8.5 22:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 04:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 04:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as overall still questionable for the needed solid independent notability, current article is not convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.