Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanja Budde (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:34, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vanja Budde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article appears to be an attempted promotion for a fairly minor TV journalist. Previous editors have called for more sources, but there really aren't any that I can find beyond social media pages and quick listings in industry directories. She does not meet the notability standard for journalists and the article might also be an attempted personal resume. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:30, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:30, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note - This AfD is displaying as "2nd nomination" but the first was actually by me moments before, and I messed up the procedure. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:34, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:18, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability, I'm considering starting a discussion on WP:NBIO to more clearly clarify that reporters' own reporting does not contribute to notability. signed, Rosguill talk 22:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.