Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Johansson
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Vanessa Johansson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As far as I can tell, this actress doesn't meet either WP:ENT or the general notability guideline. She has a famous sister, but hasn't done much herself - her most significant role so far appears to be this turkey. The article's two references appear to be about her sister, not her (one ref is a dead link, so I can't tell for sure). --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:48, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for failing WP:ENT. While Vanessa has been in some minor films and held some minor roles, what sourcability she has is more for her being a sister of Scarlett who happens to do some acting, than it is for her individual works as an actress[1].... coverage which could source a sentence at the Scarlett Johansson article such as "Scarlett's older sister Vanessa also acts in film"... but really not much else. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:12, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with Michael. I don't see her mentioned in Scarlett's article currently.--Milowent • hasspoken 12:06, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Subject's roles to date do not meet WP:ENT - apparent lack of coverage (WP:GNG) - notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Gong show 21:58, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.