Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vandarth
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:31, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vandarth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not pass WP:MUSICBIO. Mccapra (talk) 07:50, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom fails Musicbio, no substantive sources. Reywas92Talk 18:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - There is evidence that he and his various albums exist, but existence does not prove notability. He has not been noticed by reliable sources and a search only reveals the typical retail/streaming sites and self-made industry directories. Thus, the article looks like an attempted promotion. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.