Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanatühi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 18:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Vanatühi

AfDs for this article:

Votes for deletion/Vanatühi

• Articles for deletion/Vanatühi
• Articles for deletion/Vanatühi (2nd nomination)

Vanatühi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

procedural nomination—article version at start of AFD: This has been a stub without citations to support verifiability since its creation in May 2005 and has been tagged as unreferenced since mid-2007. This was found nominated for PROD-deletion; PROD nominator stated "no sources to show this god meets the notability requirements of WP:N". However, I feel this topic is notable but, apparently, unverifiable. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 06:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 06:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
• Note: WikiProject Estonia was notified of the nomination and asked for input. --Ouro (blah blah) 11:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
• Neutral for now, but there may be sources in Estonian, which would be acceptable, but since I can't read those, I have no way of judging that this is not a hoax. Part of a national mythology should be notable. "List of minor characters in Estonian mythology"? I'm joking about that of course, since this isn't a contemporary mass media thing.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 23:14, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, and add references from et:Vanapagan, (supposing that is the correct article name should also be pagemoved to Vanapagan, as Vanatühi doesn't appear to be "most common name" for this spirit). It should be noted that the Estonian language article has 7-8 book sources that appear to be fine. An Estonian may of course dispute that, if they know better. I can just get a glimmering of what the Estonian text means, not enough to be confident. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 09:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.