Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valmet 361 D Tractor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn, no longer necessary. Jac16888 ^Talk 18:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valmet 361 D Tractor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Such a bad translation that this is basically gibberish Jac16888 ^Talk 14:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - could you give me a little bit of time to attempt to clean up the appalling English in the article? Lukeno94 (talk) 15:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a big improvement to the article - I intend to get hold of a Suomi-speaking contact I have and ask him for further help. The article will need to be moved to Valmet 361 D if kept. Lukeno94 (talk) 16:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also notified the person who created this article about the discussion. Lukeno94 (talk) 16:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment An already nice cleanup of the article prose and structure by Lukeno94 seems to have answered the the nominator's criticism of gibberish. I find the article easy to read and well structured. Of course further improvements could be made, but the motivation for deletion has been addressed. Are we done here? --Mark viking (talk) 17:11, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If the English is all that is wrong, than this article shouldn't be listed for deletion. Just put up the proper tag and see if anyone and yourself can do anything about it. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 21:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It had been tagged appropriately, when I made my edits, I removed the tag. :) Lukeno94 (talk) 22:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'll be getting further input from this Suomi-speaking contact within the next few days. Could the AfD be withdrawn please Jac16888? Lukeno94 (talk) 19:51, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The motivation for deletion, that the article was gibberish, was well addressed by Lukeno94. He cleaned up the prose and structure so that the article is now easily understandable. --Mark viking (talk) 01:27, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the work I did (bad argument, but it addressed the AfD reason). I'm a bit disappointed that Jac16888 didn't return to withdraw the AfD, but that's life I guess. Lukeno94 (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.