Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valley Mall (Harrisonburg)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn From now on, I'm going to quit listing mall articles at AfD and just pitch them to Eastmain. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 01:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Valley Mall (Harrisonburg)[edit]

Doesn't seem to be a notable mall. No real sources found. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 21:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 21:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Regrettably, I must put my hat in the delete column at this time. The nominator is very active in these areas, and so if he's nominating, I'm inclined to agree. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did withdraw a lot of them, thanks to Eastmain finding sources out the yin yang. Maybe he'll save this one too. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but find sources or merge If sources can be found, absolutely keep. In my book, any Simon mall is notable (nationwide chain), as long as there is any little bit of coverage (and probably, there is). Otherwise, merge. _David ^WS _(contribs) 23:24, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some references. -- Eastmain (talk) 00:10, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If this turns out to be kept, someone should get rid of some of those section headers, those sections are too short. - Mgm|^(talk) 00:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.