Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valley Electronics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 19:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valley Electronics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP Joseph2302 (talk) 21:56, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:49, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:49, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:49, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe redirect to LadyComp - Searches for the company itself found nothing (News, Books, browser, thefreelibrary and highbeam) but searches with "LadyComp" added found results mostly press releases but if this is not enough then delete. There could be good German sources but English would be as likely used so it's very unlikely good German sources exist.SwisterTwister talk 18:55, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Here are a couple additional sources: [1], [2]. Coverage still mostly about company's products. ~Kvng (talk) 14:24, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE The NYT piece is written by the company's CEO. There is strong consensus at RSN that the Daily Mail is not reliable. The two sources linked to above appear to be the same article; both publications tend to publish thousands of press releases, or articles written from a slightly modified release. For example, the quote used in the article can be found in the press release here. There are no truly independent sources, in the article, or suggested here at the AfD discussion. CorporateM (Talk) 16:41, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Quis separabit? 03:14, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.