Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valentina (drag queen)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice towards a redirect. Kurykh (talk) 00:32, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valentina (drag queen) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON BLP of a drag queen whose only substantive claim of notability as of today is that she's a contestant in the season of RuPaul's Drag Race which just started last week. This depends almost entirely on the show's own primary source content about itself rather than reliable source coverage about her in media -- the only non-primary source here is a blog, not a notability-assisting publication. As always, just being a contestant on a reality show is not grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself -- if she's named the winner at the end of the season, then she'll get an article on those grounds, and otherwise she has to wait until she clears WP:GNG for some other reason. Bearcat (talk) 22:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The log of April 1 is overfiled
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 14:20, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: This could probably be turned back into a redirect. It's part of a school assignment, so doing this would help the teacher see the past history if they had to go back and check over the assignment - although the editing part of the class appears to be over. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:44, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete / Redirect If there is a plausible redirect target then a redirect seems fine. Not notable as a BLP though. AusLondonder (talk) 22:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.