Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valentin Bura

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted. Clear and unequivocal consensus to delete. As the last participant (LibStar) had put it: fails WP:BIO and WP:PROF. Probable WP:AUTOBIO. El_C 22:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valentin Bura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Largely unsourced autobiography; no independent sources attest notability in any of the fields where the subject and author claims to have been active. Biruitorul Talk 23:31, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--G.M.Hiram (talk) 01:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This article is extremely well-referenced, there exists a huge amount of material provided for almost every statement in the article.
The artistic notability of the creator in question is debatable, as any artistic act is. It is always hard to say which work of art is good and which isn't.
Yet, the important thing is that the referenced works are in fact authentic.
Whereas, the scientific importance of the author in question can be justified with papers and documents of an official character.
--G.M.Hiram (talk) 01:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The deleting procedure is also highly misleading and controversial as such. It is well known in professional scientific circles that when a negative hypothesis is introduced and users are asked to vote, the vast majority of the voters will be the ones harboring negative emotions on the topic. For further details on this topic please consult the page on [[1]]. --G.M.Hiram (talk) 08:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This accounts appears to be a WP:MEATPUPPET (if not a sockpuppet). Super Ψ Dro 15:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Or plausibly just a troll. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Russ Woodroofe, Aoziwe, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Abuse_filter&diff=prev&oldid=613811796 , and https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser=G.M.Hiram .   — Jeff G. ツ 13:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

}