Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V. C. Agrawal
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- V. C. Agrawal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
nn person Oo7565 (talk) 17:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 20:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 07:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to IBP. There is not enough information about the person to warrant an article independent from the company he runs. _ Mgm|(talk) 09:15, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. With respects to Mgm, there is enough available to expand and source this stub. [1] [2] [3]. Being a lowly stub is no reason to delete or merge if a better article can be created. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 18:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 13:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I just expanded and reliably sourced the article to establish notability. It now has 6 references to articles in The Hindu, The Times of India, and The Hindu Business Line. Given the number of Gnews and Gscholar hits, the article still has some room for expansion. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 16:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There was a good reference even from the start--there certainly is enough material now. DGG (talk) 22:33, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.